First of all, HAPPY NEW YEAR to all of YOU. I wish you the best in your lifes and for your families. On top of those wishes are Health and Security.
That is where Snowden’s case came back. Apparently the NYT and the Guardian have joined their forces to advocate for Snowden’s clemency, nearly 2 weeks after the Washington Post took over the Guardian in advertising the Savior : somebody called Snowden.
Hence the first question : how can you ask clemency for a Savior ? Either you are a Savior and clemency is for You to give and not to receive or even to ask for, either you are not and you should confess that, prior to any demand.
Previously, we were told Snowden was wrongly persecuted. Where are we standing today ? Is he still or not ? When you are persecuted, you don’t appeal for clemency but to Justice.
In the meantime, another new revelation has been aired over a megacomputer capable to breach any encrypted system.
Inconsistencies and lot of contradictions in Snowden’s whereabouts, narrative and storytelling.
Inconsistencies and Unanswered Questions: The Risks of Trusting the Snowden StoryBy Kevin RyanGlobal Research, January 01, 2014
Last June, Glenn Greenwald at The Guardian revealed that Edward Snowden was the NSA insider behind “one of the most significant leaks in US political history.” Snowden explained his motivations through Greenwald by saying, “There are more important things than money…. harming people isn’t my goal. Transparency is.”
Such altruistic motivations were welcome news at the time but have come into question recently given that only a tiny fraction of the documents have been released nearly a year after Snowden started working with Greenwald. Perhaps more importantly, billionaire Pierre Omidyar is funding Greenwald’s slow release of those documents. It is worth noting that Omidyar’s Paypal Corporation has links to the NSA.
It was originally reported that the number of documents Snowden had stolen was in the thousands. Today, however, that number is said to be nearly two million. This calls into question Snowden’s early statement, as reported by Greenwald, that he “carefully evaluated every single document to ensure that each was legitimately in the public interest.” The huge, new number also reveals that less than one tenth of one percent of the documents (only about 900) have actually been released to the public.
How could Snowden have “carefully evaluated every single” one of what is now being said to be nearly two million documents? He only worked for Booz Allen Hamilton for a few months. According to NSA Director Keith Alexander, Snowden also worked directly for NSA for twelve months prior to that, which is interesting. But still, that would require carefully evaluating thousands of documents a day during that entire time. Didn’t he have a job apart from that?
Journalist Margie Burns asked some good questions back in June that have not yet been answered. She wondered about the 29-year old Snowden who had been a U.S. Army Special Forces recruit, a covert CIA operative, and an NSA employee in various capacities, all in just a few, short years. Burns asked “How, exactly, did Snowden get his series of NSA jobs? Did he apply through regular channels? Was it through someone he knew? Who recommended him? Who were his references for a string of six-figure, high-level security jobs? Are there any safeguards in place so that red flags go up when a subcontractor jumps from job to job, especially in high-level clearance positions?”
Five months later, journalists Mark Ames and Yasha Levine investigated some of the businesses in which Greenwald’s benefactor Omidyar had invested. They found that the actual practices of those businesses were considerably less humanitarian than the outward appearance of Omidyar’s ventures often portray. The result was that Omidyar took down references to at least one of those businesses from his website.
Get the whole story here
Picture. Elise Mbock. Christmas night 2013.